* Mike Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> I've gotten some good traction on the changes in the following patch.
> About 30% of the kernel is compiling right now and I'm picking up
> errors and warnings as I'm going along. I think it's doing most of
> what we need. Attempting to hide the cpumask struct definition caused
> all kinds of problems with the inline functions and statically
> declaring cpumask's.
>
> (The following patch is a combination of all the changes to cpumask.h
> with the header from the first patch. I'll send you a complete copy
> in separate email.)
could you please send whatever .c changes you have already, so that we
can have a look at how the end result will look like? Doesnt have to
build, i'm just curious about how it looks like in practice,
semantically.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
