I too would prefer to see the base as clean as possible -Jonas
On 9/5/05, Eduardo Tongson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like to support Andreas here, on general assumption that 50 megs of> > > supporting packages is nothing if the tool (language) itself is > > appropriate> for the job and if the tools has a fairly wide support. > > Recognized, supported> and stable is what lisp seems like to me. > I thought Dragonfly was diverging from a bloated base. perl was removed from > the base system, but adding a 50 meg dep is nothing? > --ed >
