propolice wrote @ Mon, 5 Sep 2005 14:25:24 +0000: > > I'd like to support Andreas here, on general assumption that 50 megs of> > > supporting packages is nothing if the tool (language) itself is > > appropriate> for the job and if the tools has a fairly wide support. > > Recognized, supported> and stable is what lisp seems like to me. > I thought Dragonfly was diverging from a bloated base. perl was removed from > the base system, but adding a 50 meg dep is nothing?
Oh can we please drop the absurd discussion about 50 MB ? The scheme or lua suggested is in another dimension. 186K lua-5.0.2.tar.gz 3,4M chicken-2.0.tar.gz And even the commom lisp mentioned which i called bloat is not near. 9,4M clisp-2.35.tar.gz Andy
