On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:22:16 -0800 (PST)
Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Plus, I need a name for this baby. I can't use DFS, however much I
> want to, because the term is already over-used.
Clusterable Logless Unix Segmented Transactional Efficient Rewindable File
System
CLUSTERFS :)
Or perhaps just CUFS - Clusterable Unix File System.
Or should there be some fatal flaw[1] lurking undiscovered in the
design it could become instead:
Dillon's Infinitely Snapshotable And Segmented Transactional Exabyte
Repository
<g d+r>
[1] Unlikely given Matt's track record of course.
--
C:>WIN | Directable Mirror Arrays
The computer obeys and wins. | A better way to focus the sun
You lose and Bill collects. | licences available see
| http://www.sohara.org/
