On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:09:27 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: [SNIP]
> Sanity checks in the code can handle unsynchronized hosts, guarentee > monotonic increasing transaction ids, and prevent the filesystem > from becoming corrupted. Deliberately generating absurd time stamps > would be a bigger problem... for example, basing your cluster on a > single machine's RTC would be a bad idea. At the very least you > would want an NTP-synchronized time source. If this is a requirement perhaps there should be some integration of NTP into the FS & it's utilities. It would make sense from the SSI point of view. Regards, Rupert
