On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 04:38:43PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Dave Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > FYI, I've just done the same thing in f18 during the 3.9 rebase.
> > > > I don't see us pushing this out until 3.9.1 lands, but please sort
> > out the
> > > > config options there too.
> > >
> > > Thanks, I'll look at it now, for <= F-18 we still support v5tel so I
> > > need to deal with that.
> > >
> > > Any idea on eta for 3.9.1?
> >
> > Probably sometime this week I would guess. There's already over a hundred
> > patches queued on Linux-stable for 3.9
> >
> > Greg typically seems to wait until Linus tags rc1, so whenever the merge
> > window closes, you can probably expect 3.9.1 to land pretty soon
> > afterwards.
>
> I'm kinda hesitant on that plan. We seem to always pull in some
> patches from -rc1 that wind up being broken and fixed with a later RC,
> or reverted outright. Of course, there isn't a great answer there but
> maybe we can bump the karma requirement up when the update is filed?
Works for me. For 17 we can delay a little longer too (at least while
3.8.x updates are still going out) if we want to be extra safe, and rebase
once we get to 3.9.2 or 3.9.3
Dave
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
