On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Peter Robinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Justin M. Forbes <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 00:37 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Dave Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 04:26:52PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>>> >  > On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 09:13:30PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> >  >  > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Dave Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >  >  > > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 02:02:12PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> >  >  > >  > I would feel extremely bad if I pushed something to git that 
>>> > didn't even
>>> >  >  > >  > pass 'make prep'.  As a compromise, I added this line in 
>>> > kernel.spec:
>>> >  >  > >  >
>>> >  >  > >  > @@ -1451,6 +1451,8 @@ mkdir configs
>>> >  >  > >  >  rm -f kernel-%{version}-*debug.config
>>> >  >  > >  >  %endif
>>> >  >  > >  >
>>> >  >  > >  > +rm -f kernel-%{version}-arm*.config
>>> >  >  > >  > +
>>> >  >  > >  >  # now run oldconfig over all the config files
>>> >  >  > >  >
>>> >  >  > >  > So the ARM configs won't be included in the prep run.  That 
>>> > lets things
>>> >  >  > >  > progress on all the other arches for now.  Just remove that 
>>> > line, fix
>>> >  >  > >  > things up, and push out.
>>> >  >  > >
>>> >  >  > > FYI, I've just done the same thing in f18 during the 3.9 rebase.
>>> >  >  > > I don't see us pushing this out until 3.9.1 lands, but please 
>>> > sort out the
>>> >  >  > > config options there too.
>>> >  >  >
>>> >  >  > Thanks, I'll look at it now, for <= F-18 we still support v5tel so I
>>> >  >  > need to deal with that.
>>> >  >  >
>>> >  >  > Any idea on eta for 3.9.1?
>>> >  >
>>> >  > Probably sometime this week I would guess. There's already over a 
>>> > hundred
>>> >  > patches queued on Linux-stable for 3.9
>>> >  >
>>> >  > Greg typically seems to wait until Linus tags rc1, so whenever the 
>>> > merge
>>> >  > window closes, you can probably expect 3.9.1 to land pretty soon 
>>> > afterwards.
>>> >
>>> > And just after I posted that he posted 3.9.1-rc1 with the comment..
>>> >
>>> > "Responses should be made by Wed May  8 20:28:24 UTC 2013."
>>> >
>>> > I'll roll the rc1 into git after dinner to get some testing, but
>>> > I won't be pushing out an update until later in the week.
>>>
>>> I've pushed the 3.9 ARM config changes to the F-18 branch, it passes
>>> make prep and the allarchconfig.sh config script, I'll do a scratch
>>> build but that should stop ARM from blocking the rebase. Thanks
>> Will F17 need the same, or something different?
>
> The same, but I forgot that 3.9 needed a few patches and of course I
> managed to miss the 3.9.1 push by mere moments.

I'm happy to help push those if you like, but there's some config file
name changes due to OMAP being supported as part of the multiplatform
kernel as well as matching Makefile.config plus the patches.

Peter
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel

Reply via email to