On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 01:17:50PM -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > The more I look at lshw, the more I'm ambivalent (I'm not against it, > just not for it either). It certainly collects a lot of relevant > information. However, I see the following problems. > > 1. lshw tries to make things human readable. This is bad for > databases. We want to record things like immutable numeric hardware > IDs rather than the current contents of pci.ids. lshw does provide > -numeric, but this just adds the numbers to the human readable > strings. > > 2. lshw collects a lot of data we may not be interested in. For > example, it reports the four different kinds of floppy disk drives my > BIOS supports. Also, L1, L2 and L3 cache. There is a bunch of stuff > like this. Is it useful? Some of it definitely is. But transferring > unwanted data over the wire is not being a good netizen. Also, some > people pay for data per MB transferred. We should be respectful. > > 3. lshw supports '-sanitize', but this merely replaces the values with > '[REMOVED]'. See above for why we don't want to transmit this data. > > 4. lshw reports bus configuration. I'm not sure if this is relevant or > how we would want to map this data. For example, if Dell uses the same > hardware in a bunch of laptops then we can deduplicate this to one > "hardware profile." But if bus configuration is part of this profile, > then we will have much higher cardinality. If this information is > important to have, we can make it work. But if not, it would be better > to try to save storage. > > 5. lshw doesn't seem to have a way to separate "system hardware" from > "transient hardware." To be fair, this may be impossible. But it would > be nice to understand the difference between, say, my bluetooth radio > and my YubiKey. I can't easily remove the former but I can the latter. > This also goes to cardinality reduction. > > 6. lshw mixes things that are transient with things that are > permanent. We can remove the timestamps with -notime. But, for > example, it reports the kernel module currently assigned to a piece of > hardware. This is probably relevant information, but we will have to > carefully separate the data based on its lifespan. > > 7. lshw reports virtual NICs as physical ones. We probably don't care > about this and I certainly don't want to bloat the database with > everyone's docker subnets unnecessarily.
Again, I was just pointing out a tool we use internally for inventorying our hardware that I thought might be useful. If it doesn't work for you, feel free to choose something else. :-) I do appreciate the feedback you provided. I might work with folks on my team to address some of them as they could be of benefit for our work too. Cheers, Don > > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Jeremy Cline <jer...@jcline.org> wrote: > > On 11/09/2017 09:12 AM, Don Zickus wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:02:05PM -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > >>> It isn't documented in F27, but it does work. However, we probably > >>> want at least this patch: > >>> https://github.com/lyonel/lshw/commit/135a853c60582b14c5b67e5cd988a8062d9896f4 > >> > >> And some beaker stuff looks interesting in > >> > >> https://github.com/lyonel/lshw/commit/f95aa917a84a8ee74ce79e9b4f9e198d21a2e4d9 > >> > >> Regardless. My overall point was the lshw tool seems to embody a lot of > >> what you were looking for and thought it could be useful (with some more > >> fixes) instead of re-inventing the wheel with new plugins. :-) > >> > >> Up to you guys. > > > > I have no desire to re-invent wheels so I think it makes sense for us to > > use lshw. Knowing it's being used internally is also good. > > > > > > -- > > Jeremy Cline > > XMPP: jer...@jcline.org > > IRC: jcline > > > _______________________________________________ > kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
