From: Thorsten Leemhuis on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/968#note_531084467
> a spring cleaning From my point of view it needs even more that that, but yeah, it would be a start. :-D Anyway: > When you say the configs are different, can you clarify a bit? I believe it should work correctly. I tried to look closer. First I failed: I merge kernel-ark/ark-infa ontop on linus/master and ran `make NO_CONFIGCHECKS=1 dist-srpm`, which resulted in ``` make NO_CONFIGCHECKS=1 dist-srpm make -C redhat dist-srpm make[1]: Entering directory '/home/kbuilder/tmp/linux/redhat' BUILDID is ".test". make[1]: *** [Makefile:69: dist-kabi] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/kbuilder/tmp/linux/redhat' make: *** [makefile:12: dist-srpm] Error 2 ``` (side note: if you try to reproduce it make sure to do a 'rm -rf redhat/; git reset --hard', as I noticed it seems to be related to some files listed in .gitignore [or something like that]) Then I tried to do manually what this patch achieves and then things worked. I installed the SRPM and compared kernel-x86_64-fedora.config to the one found in Fedora dist.git for rawhide (I hope that was a proper way to check) and they looked quite different, even after sorting both of them and comparing them again. I wonder if this is due to the `NO_CONFIGCHECKS=1`. Wasn't there some variable to say "check configs, but don't fail if something is not set" or something like that which might be more appropriate? _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
