2008/11/20 Santiago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > @Roberto A. Foglietta: >> Why unionfs is not the answer to your needs? > > Hm, I only scratched the docs of unionfs and aufs a bit - the latter a bit > deeper - don't know whether I got it right: > > I want to "manage" several other filesystems (like unionfs and aufs). The main > difference is, I want to change the filesystem during a read or write > operation. Change in the meaning of mount/unmount - not just use another > pointer.
It does not make any sense for me changing the underlying fs during I/O or u/mount operations. Anyway if you manage to do that I will be happy to learn by you. Cheers, -- /roberto -- To unsubscribe from this list: send an email with "unsubscribe kernelnewbies" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ
