Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think this just leaves us with deciding on a mechanism for how to do > single-application quirks. I take Andi's point that adding a flag set to the > quirk data structure is a fine solution, but I'm really ok with static > integers > in individual functions. Do we have consensus on how to handle that? I'm > happy > either way, but I'd rather have agreement on how to handle it before I post > another iteration of this patch.
As long as the solution is simple, small and concise I don't care. And since what will make Andi happy seems to meet those criteria, that should be fine. Eric _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
