On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:59:47PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:53:23PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 02:57:53PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote: > > > > > > Ok, I've got a new patch here. In response to Bernhard and Viveks > > > concerns, > > > I've added a few checks. Bernhard, thank you for digging into the > > > history of > > > the addition of the 2048 byte command line. As I understand what you've > > > posted > > > heres what we need to capture: > > > > > > On X86: > > > Boot loader version >= 2.06 > > > error if cmdline_len > setup_header.cmdline_size > > > 2.05 > Boot loader version > 2.06 > > > warn if cmdline_len > 255 > > > Boot loader version < 2.05 > > > error if cmdline_len > 255 > > > > > > on X86_64: > > > Boot loader version >= 2.04 > > > error if cmdline_len > setup_header.cmdline_size > > > > cmdline_size was introduced only in version 2.06. So this will run > > into trouble on x86_64 version 2.04 and 2.05, isn't it? > > > Then how did version 2.04 on x86_64 determine its maximum command line length? > Or did it just assume a max length of 2048 bytes?
I think it just did not tell. There was no way for a kernel bzImage to tell boot-loader what's the supported command line size is (Pre 2.06). Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
