Hi, On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:51:30 +0900 Akio Takebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Itsuro > > >--- include/xen/interface/kexec.h.org 2008-03-25 09:08:43.000000000 > >+0900 > >+++ include/xen/interface/kexec.h 2008-03-25 09:12:02.000000000 +0900 > >@@ -111,6 +111,10 @@ > > #define KEXEC_RANGE_MA_CRASH 0 /* machine address and size of crash area > > */ > > #define KEXEC_RANGE_MA_XEN 1 /* machine address and size of Xen itself > > */ > > #define KEXEC_RANGE_MA_CPU 2 /* machine address and size of a CPU note > > */ > >+#define KEXEC_RANGE_MA_VMCOREINFO 3 /* machine address and size of > >vmcoreinfo */ > >+ > >+extern size_t vmcoreinfo_max_size_xen; > Why don't you use VMCOREINFO_BYTES (4096) instead of vmcoreinfo_max_size_xen? There is no significant reason now. Just reserve the posibility to make it variable. Thanks. -- Itsuro ODA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
