Hi Jay,

Jay Lan wrote:
>>> In case of jay, it looks creating bitmaps itself took a long time. 
>>>
>> Do you have data for this?  I've not seen it.
> 
> I just posted detailed data. My initial post gave the amount of time
> spent in create_dump_bitmap().
> 
> The processing rate of pfn inside create_dump_bitmap() is about
>    184500-pfn/sec  on memory map that does not contain data needs to
>                    be saved.
>    213700-pfn/sec  on memory map that contain data to be saved.
> 
> Here is some memory mappend from /proc/iomem:
> 16003000000-16033dfffff : System RAM
> 16033e00000-160f7ffffff : System RAM
> 16800000000-168f7ffffff : System RAM
> 
> We do not spent time in scanning pfn between 160f8000000 and
> 16800000000.

In Bernhard's mail:
> 6045b9f000-60f7ffdfff : System RAM
> 16000100000-160003fffff : System RAM
> 16003000000-16033dfffff : System RAM

I guess that makedumpfile spends time in scanning memory gap
between 0x60f7ffdfff and 0x16000100000 when creating 1st-bitmap.

I created the attached patch that makedumpfile does not scan
memory gap when creating 1st-bitmap. Could you please try it ?
This patch is for makedumpfile-1.2.6.


Thanks
Ken'ichi Ohmichi


diff -puN backup/v1.2.6/makedumpfile.c makedumpfile/makedumpfile.c
--- backup/v1.2.6/makedumpfile.c        2008-06-05 15:17:17.000000000 +0900
+++ makedumpfile/makedumpfile.c 2008-07-17 22:33:58.000000000 +0900
@@ -3987,8 +3987,10 @@ exclude_free_page()
 int
 create_1st_bitmap()
 {
+       int i;
        char *buf = NULL;
-       unsigned long long pfn, paddr;
+       unsigned long long pfn, pfn_start, pfn_end, pfn_bitmap1;
+       struct pt_load_segment *pls;
        off_t offset_page;
        int ret = FALSE;
 
@@ -4021,13 +4023,17 @@ create_1st_bitmap()
        /*
         * If page is on memory hole, set bit on the 1st-bitmap.
         */
-       for (pfn = 0, paddr = 0; pfn < info->max_mapnr;
-           pfn++, paddr += info->page_size) {
-               if (is_in_segs(paddr))
+       for (i = pfn_bitmap1 = 0; i < info->num_load_memory; i++) {
+               pls = &info->pt_load_segments[i];
+               pfn_start = pls->phys_start / info->page_size;
+               pfn_end = pls->phys_end / info->page_size;
+               for (pfn = pfn_start; pfn < pfn_end; pfn++) {
                        set_bit_on_1st_bitmap(pfn);
-               else
-                       pfn_memhole++;
+                       pfn_bitmap1++;
+               }
        }
+       pfn_memhole = info->max_mapnr - pfn_bitmap1;
+
        if (!sync_1st_bitmap())
                goto out;
 

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Reply via email to