Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> + r = set_virt_disable_func(crash_hardware_disable); >> > > Can we make this say: > set_virt_disable_func(kvm_x86_ops->crash_hardware_disable); > > So we can avoid going through 2 levels of function pointers? > I find that a little scary in code that might be running > at the edge of stack overflow. >
Actually, with scheduling disabled we can overflow the stack as much as we like. It will reduce the quality of the dump, but everything ought to work. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
