于 2011年01月09日 10:09, Eric W. Biederman 写道:
We aren't dealing with modules I think CAP_SYS_MODULE is totally irrelevant in the context of kexec.
Yeah, although I don't really understand CAP_SYS_MODULE, but it really confused me to add it to kexec_load() from its name.
I think to accomplish what you want we either need a way to disable sys_kexec_load or possibly a new very targeted capability bit. You are making it so that giving someone CAP_SYS_MODULE is giving more than the ability to load kernel modules. Which seems non-intuitive from a system management point of view.
How about CAP_SYS_KEXEC? Thanks. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
