Hello HATAYAMA-san, On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:23:59 +0900 (JST) HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatay...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
[...] > >>> Hi Atushi san, > >>> > >>> Good to see this work making progress. I have few queries. > >>> > >>> - Do you have some numbers for bigger machines like 1TB or higher memory. > >>> I am curious to know how bad is the time penalty. > >> > >> I'm afraid that I don't have such a large machine, so I need someone who > >> can > >> measure execution time in large machine. > >> > > > > I can prepare such machine but I cannot say I can use the machine on > > this day precisely for example. But I think it must be until the end > > of this month at most. So, I would like to fix content of benchmark > > first. > > > > Hello Kumagai-san, > > I'm now trying to reserve the machine with big memory, but I'm not > accurately sure when I can use the machine; expecting within this > month? In advance, I want to make sure what I measure in this > benchmark in more detail. OK, I'm glad for your help. > I'm going to collect at least what you showed in your benchmark: RSS > size for no option, -cd31 and -Ed31. Is there another to collect? Would you collect RSS also for --split ? While I expect the RSS will be increase based on number of child processes, I want to see measured data. Thanks Atsushi Kumagai _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
