>On 07/02/14 at 10:41am, Petr Tesarik wrote: >> On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 16:26:54 +0800 >> Baoquan He <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On 06/17/14 at 02:32am, Atsushi Kumagai wrote: >> > >> > > +static void >> > > +setup_page_is_hugepage(void) >> > > +{ >> > > + if (NUMBER(PG_head) != NOT_FOUND_NUMBER) { >> > > + if (NUMBER(PG_tail) == NOT_FOUND_NUMBER) { >> > > + /* >> > > + * If PG_tail is not explicitly saved, then >> > > assume >> > > + * that it immediately follows PG_head. >> > > + */ >> > > + NUMBER(PG_tail) = NUMBER(PG_head) + 1; >> > > + } >> > > + } else if ((NUMBER(PG_compound) != NOT_FOUND_NUMBER) >> > > + && (info->dump_level & DL_EXCLUDE_USER_DATA)) { >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I may not understand hugepage well. I am wondering why hugepage >> > filtering can't be done if PG_compound is available. >> >> Oh, maybe I'm missing something. What do you suggest as an alternative >> way to recognize a huge page if the value of PG_compound is not known? > >No, what I understood is PG_compound is known if >(NUMBER(PG_compound) != NOT_FOUND_NUMBER). > >I am not sure about this.
It's just my mistake, sorry! BTW, I'm testing the v3 patch based on the Petr's comment, sorry for keeping you waiting for it. Thanks Atsushi Kumagai _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
