Hello,

Thanks for your quick work.
I have a suggestion below.

>Hi,
>
>So the output is like below now:
>
>~$ ./makedumpfile --mem-usage /proc/kcore
>The kernel version is not supported.
>The makedumpfile operation may be incomplete.
>
>TYPE           PAGES                   EXCLUDABLE      DESCRIPTION
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>ZERO           28247                   yes             Pages filled
>with zero
>CACHE          240114                  yes             Cache pages
>CACHE_PRIVATE  17902                   yes             Cache pages +
>private
>USER           19713                   yes             User process
>pages
>FREE           3639969                 yes             Free pages
>KERN_DATA      103723                  no              Dumpable kernel
>data
>
>page size:             4096
>Total pages on system: 4049668

I think it's better for users to print the total size also in byte unit.
It's just a product of the page size and the number of pages, 
but it will be helpful since we generally count storage spaces in
byte unit.


Thanks 
Atsushi Kumagai

>
>That warning won't occur on kernel which makedumpfile declares to
>support,  Just notice user the kernel they are using is not tested
>yet on compatibility. So it should not be a problem.
>
>Thanks
>Baoquan
>
>
>On 09/03/14 at 05:13pm, Baoquan He wrote:
>> Adjust the message printing when specify option --mem-usage. Try to
>> avoid the unrelated printing.
>>
>> And add the page size info.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  makedumpfile.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/makedumpfile.c b/makedumpfile.c
>> index c965745..f804079 100644
>> --- a/makedumpfile.c
>> +++ b/makedumpfile.c
>> @@ -4939,7 +4939,8 @@ exclude_unnecessary_pages_cyclic(struct cycle *cycle)
>>
>>              for (mm = 0; mm < info->num_mem_map; mm++) {
>>
>> -                    print_progress(PROGRESS_UNN_PAGES, mm, 
>> info->num_mem_map);
>> +                    if (!info->flag_mem_usage)
>> +                            print_progress(PROGRESS_UNN_PAGES, mm, 
>> info->num_mem_map);
>>
>>                      mmd = &info->mem_map_data[mm];
>>
>> @@ -4957,8 +4958,10 @@ exclude_unnecessary_pages_cyclic(struct cycle *cycle)
>>              /*
>>               * print [100 %]
>>               */
>> -            print_progress(PROGRESS_UNN_PAGES, info->num_mem_map, 
>> info->num_mem_map);
>> -            print_execution_time(PROGRESS_UNN_PAGES, &tv_start);
>> +            if (!info->flag_mem_usage) {
>> +                    print_progress(PROGRESS_UNN_PAGES, info->num_mem_map, 
>> info->num_mem_map);
>> +                    print_execution_time(PROGRESS_UNN_PAGES, &tv_start);
>> +            }
>>      }
>>
>>      return TRUE;
>> @@ -7960,9 +7963,8 @@ print_mem_usage(void)
>>      shrinking = shrinking / pfn_original;
>>
>>      MSG("\n");
>> -    MSG("\n");
>> -    
>> MSG("----------------------------------------------------------------------\n");
>>      MSG("TYPE               PAGES                   EXCLUDABLE      
>> DESCRIPTION\n");
>> +    
>> MSG("----------------------------------------------------------------------\n");
>>
>>      MSG("ZERO               %-16llu yes             Pages filled with 
>> zero\n", pfn_zero);
>>      MSG("CACHE              %-16llu yes             Cache pages\n", 
>> pfn_cache);
>> @@ -7975,6 +7977,7 @@ print_mem_usage(void)
>>
>>      MSG("\n");
>>
>> +    MSG("page size:         %-16ld\n", info->page_size);
>>      MSG("Total pages on system:     %-16llu\n", pfn_original);
>>  }
>>
>> @@ -9614,10 +9617,10 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>      retcd = COMPLETED;
>>  out:
>>      MSG("\n");
>> -    if (retcd == COMPLETED)
>> -            MSG("makedumpfile Completed.\n");
>> -    else
>> +    if (retcd != COMPLETED)
>>              MSG("makedumpfile Failed.\n");
>> +    else if (!info->flag_mem_usage)
>> +            MSG("makedumpfile Completed.\n");
>>
>>      if (info) {
>>              if (info->dh_memory)
>> --
>> 1.8.5.3
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>kexec mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Reply via email to