Hi Geoff,
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:49:04PM +0100, Geoff Levand wrote:
> Add the new arm64 routine local_disable() to allow the masking of several DAIF
> flags in one operation. Currently, we only have routines to mask individual
> flags, and to mask several flags multiple calls to daifset are required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geoff Levand <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
> index 11cc941..28521d4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
> @@ -113,5 +113,18 @@ static inline int arch_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long
> flags)
> #define local_dbg_enable() asm("msr daifclr, #8" : : : "memory")
> #define local_dbg_disable() asm("msr daifset, #8" : : : "memory")
>
> +enum daif_flag {
Is there any reason for this to be an enum rather than a set of
#defines?
It would be nice to be able to use these in asm.
> + DAIF_FIQ = (1UL << 6),
> + DAIF_IRQ = (1UL << 7),
> + DAIF_ASYNC = (1UL << 8),
> + DAIF_DBG = (1UL << 9),
> + DAIF_ALL = (0xffUL << 6),
Not 0xf?
It would be nicer to OR the other flags.
> +};
> +
> +static inline void local_disable(unsigned long daif_flags)
> +{
> + arch_local_irq_restore(daif_flags | arch_local_save_flags());
If we knew the value was a constant (which we could check with
__builting_constant_p) we could use daifset here, rather than having a
RMW sequence.
With that, the other local_*_{enable,disable} calls could be rewritten
in terms of this, without affecting the generated code. That would
require some shifting to account for the difference between pstate and
daif{clr,set} layout, but for constants that shouldn't be a problem.
Thanks,
Mark.
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
