On 05/28/16 at 02:53pm, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 07:33:54PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 05/03/16 at 11:21am, Russell King wrote:
> > > diff --git a/kexec/kexec-uImage.c b/kexec/kexec-uImage.c
> > > index 9df601b..5e24629 100644
> > > --- a/kexec/kexec-uImage.c
> > > +++ b/kexec/kexec-uImage.c
> > > @@ -82,7 +82,8 @@ int uImage_probe(const unsigned char *buf, off_t len, 
> > > unsigned int arch)
> > >   if (be32_to_cpu(header.ih_size) > len - sizeof(header)) {
> > >           printf("uImage header claims that image has %d bytes\n",
> > >                           be32_to_cpu(header.ih_size));
> > > -         printf("we read only %ld bytes.\n", len - sizeof(header));
> > > +         printf("we read only %lld bytes.\n",
> > > +                (long long)len - sizeof(header));
> > 
> > With "D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64" adding, off_t is identical to off64_t, is
> > that necessary to still take a type conversion here?
> 
> The printf format specifies an argument of "long long" type, which is
> defined as a data type of at least 64-bits wide.  So, it's more
> correct to cast to long long, rather than relying on off64_t being
> the same size as long long.

Ok, it's fine to have an explict cast here so that people don't need
to consider off_t is long or long long.

Ack this patch.

Acked-by: Baoquan He <[email protected]>

Thanks
Baoquan


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Reply via email to