On 06/06/2016:06:00:05 PM, Russell King wrote:
> Rather than using ULONG_MAX to decide whether to use the ELF64 or ELF32
> core dump format, use UINT32_MAX instead - we include stdint.h, so we
> might as well use a constant which is meaningful for the limits of
> the 32-bit ELF format.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <r...@arm.linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Anand <pan...@redhat.com>
> ---
> kexec/arch/arm/crashdump-arm.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kexec/arch/arm/crashdump-arm.c b/kexec/arch/arm/crashdump-arm.c
> index a390187..fcc4d42 100644
> --- a/kexec/arch/arm/crashdump-arm.c
> +++ b/kexec/arch/arm/crashdump-arm.c
> @@ -369,8 +369,7 @@ int load_crashdump_segments(struct kexec_info *info, char
> *mod_cmdline)
> if (last_ranges < 0)
> last_ranges = 0;
>
> - if (crash_memory_ranges[last_ranges].end > ULONG_MAX) {
> -
> + if (crash_memory_ranges[last_ranges].end > UINT32_MAX) {
> /* for support LPAE enabled kernel*/
> elf_info.class = ELFCLASS64;
>
> --
> 1.9.1
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
