>> On Friday 03 March 2017 07:40 AM, Atsushi Kumagai wrote:
>> > > + if (info->kernel_version < KERNEL_VERSION(4, 11, 0) &&
>> > > + !info->flag_force) {
>> > > + MSG("mem-usage not supported for this
>> > > kernel.\n");
>> > > + MSG("You can try with -f if your kernel's kcore
>> > > has valid p_paddr\n");
>> > > + goto out;
>> > > + }
>> > You forgot to set COMPLETED to retcd before goto.
>> > The behavior will be different from the v2 patch.
>>
>>
>> I had thought about it. Should not an unsupported feature be a FAILED case?
>
>
>Judging from the result, it should be a failed case. People expect to
>get a dumped vmcore, it failed to collect at last because of unmatched
>kernel and tool.
When you change the design, please note it into changelog,
it's a review point of view.
Changes since v2:
- Fixed a memory leak issue and updated man page and usage info
As for the return value, I guess both is OK if there is a clear intention.
If this is what you intended, I have no objection.
(it actually sounds more reasonable)
So I'll merge the v3 patch into v1.6.2, thanks for your work.
Regards,
Atsushi Kumagai
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
