On 05/05/2017 at 05:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Xunlei Pang <xp...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 05/05/2017 at 02:52 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Xunlei Pang <xlp...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @@ -122,6 +122,10 @@ static int init_pgtable(struct kimage *image,
>>>> unsigned long start_pgtable)
>>>>
>>>> level4p = (pgd_t *)__va(start_pgtable);
>>>> clear_page(level4p);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (direct_gbpages)
>>>> + info.direct_gbpages = true;
>>> No, this should be keyed off the CPU feature (X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES)
>>> automatically,
>>> not set blindly! AFAICS this patch will crash kexec on any CPU that does
>>> not
>>> support gbpages.
>> It should be fine, probe_page_size_mask() already takes care of this:
>> if (direct_gbpages && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES)) {
>> printk(KERN_INFO "Using GB pages for direct mapping\n");
>> page_size_mask |= 1 << PG_LEVEL_1G;
>> } else {
>> direct_gbpages = 0;
>> }
>>
>> So if X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES is not supported, direct_gbpages will be set to 0.
> So why is the introduction of the info.direct_gbpages flag necessary? AFAICS
> it
> just duplicates the kernel's direct_gbpages flag. One outcome is that
> hibernation
> won't use gbpages, which is silly.
boot/compressed/pagetable.c also uses kernel_ident_mapping_init() for kaslr,
at the moment
we don't have "direct_gbpages" definition or X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES feature
detection.
I thought that we can change the other call sites when found really needed.
Regards,
Xunlei
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
