On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 04:19:30PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> The SMP MP-table is built by UEFI and placed in memory in a decrypted
> state. These tables are accessed using a mix of early_memremap(),
> early_memunmap(), phys_to_virt() and virt_to_phys(). Change all accesses
> to use early_memremap()/early_memunmap(). This allows for proper setting
> of the encryption mask so that the data can be successfully accessed when
> SME is active.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lenda...@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c |  102 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c b/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
> index fd37f39..afbda41d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c
> @@ -429,7 +429,21 @@ static inline void __init 
> construct_default_ISA_mptable(int mpc_default_type)
>       }
>  }
>  
> -static struct mpf_intel *mpf_found;
> +static unsigned long mpf_base;
> +
> +static void __init unmap_mpf(struct mpf_intel *mpf)
> +{
> +     early_memunmap(mpf, sizeof(*mpf));
> +}
> +
> +static struct mpf_intel * __init map_mpf(unsigned long paddr)
> +{
> +     struct mpf_intel *mpf;
> +
> +     mpf = early_memremap(paddr, sizeof(*mpf));
> +
> +     return mpf;

        return early_memremap(paddr, sizeof(*mpf));

...

> @@ -842,25 +873,26 @@ static int __init update_mp_table(void)
>       if (!enable_update_mptable)
>               return 0;
>  
> -     mpf = mpf_found;
> -     if (!mpf)
> +     if (!mpf_base)
>               return 0;
>  
> +     mpf = map_mpf(mpf_base);
> +
>       /*
>        * Now see if we need to go further.
>        */
>       if (mpf->feature1 != 0)

You're kidding, right? map_mpf() *can* return NULL.

Also, simplify that test:

        if (mpf->feature1)
                ...


> -             return 0;
> +             goto do_unmap_mpf;
>  
>       if (!mpf->physptr)
> -             return 0;
> +             goto do_unmap_mpf;
>  
> -     mpc = phys_to_virt(mpf->physptr);
> +     mpc = map_mpc(mpf->physptr);

Again: error checking !!!

You have other calls to early_memremap()/map_mpf() in this patch. Please
add error checking everywhere.

>  
>       if (!smp_check_mpc(mpc, oem, str))
> -             return 0;
> +             goto do_unmap_mpc;
>  
> -     pr_info("mpf: %llx\n", (u64)virt_to_phys(mpf));
> +     pr_info("mpf: %llx\n", (u64)mpf_base);
>       pr_info("physptr: %x\n", mpf->physptr);
>  
>       if (mpc_new_phys && mpc->length > mpc_new_length) {
> @@ -878,21 +910,23 @@ static int __init update_mp_table(void)
>               new = mpf_checksum((unsigned char *)mpc, mpc->length);
>               if (old == new) {
>                       pr_info("mpc is readonly, please try alloc_mptable 
> instead\n");
> -                     return 0;
> +                     goto do_unmap_mpc;
>               }
>               pr_info("use in-position replacing\n");
>       } else {
>               mpf->physptr = mpc_new_phys;
> -             mpc_new = phys_to_virt(mpc_new_phys);
> +             mpc_new = map_mpc(mpc_new_phys);

Ditto.

>               memcpy(mpc_new, mpc, mpc->length);
> +             unmap_mpc(mpc);
>               mpc = mpc_new;
>               /* check if we can modify that */
>               if (mpc_new_phys - mpf->physptr) {
>                       struct mpf_intel *mpf_new;
>                       /* steal 16 bytes from [0, 1k) */
>                       pr_info("mpf new: %x\n", 0x400 - 16);
> -                     mpf_new = phys_to_virt(0x400 - 16);
> +                     mpf_new = map_mpf(0x400 - 16);

Ditto.

>                       memcpy(mpf_new, mpf, 16);
> +                     unmap_mpf(mpf);
>                       mpf = mpf_new;
>                       mpf->physptr = mpc_new_phys;
>               }

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Reply via email to