Hi Mikhail,
> -----Original Message-----
> Hi,
>
> On 12.12.2019 17:12, Kazuhito Hagio wrote:
> > Hi Mikhail,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> Hello Kazu,
> >>
> >> I think we can try to generalize the kaslr offset extraction.
> >> I won't speak for other architectures, but for s390 that
> >> get_kaslr_offset_arm64()
> >> should work fine. The only concern of mine is this TODO statement:
> >>
> >> if (_text <= vaddr && vaddr <= _end) {
> >> DEBUG_MSG("info->kaslr_offset: %lx\n", info->kaslr_offset);
> >> return info->kaslr_offset;
> >> } else {
> >> /*
> >> * TODO: we need to check if it is vmalloc/vmmemmap/module
> >> * address, we will have different offset
> >> */
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> Could you explain this one?
> >
> > Probably it was considered that the check would be needed to support
> > the whole KASLR behavior when get_kaslr_offset_x86_64() was written
> > originally.
> >
> > But in the current makedumpfile for x86_64 and arm64 supporting KASLR,
> > the offset we need is the one for symbol addresses in vmlinux only.
> > As I said below, module symbol addresses are retrieved from vmcore.
> > Other addresses should not be passed to the function for now, as far
> > as I know.
> >
> > So I think the TODO comment is confusing, and it would be better to
> > remove it or change it to something like:
> > /*
> > * Returns 0 if vaddr does not need the offset to be added,
> > * e.g. for module address.
> > */
> >
> > But if s390 uses get_kaslr_offset() in its arch-specific code to
> > adjust addresses other than kernel text address, we might need to
> > modify it for s390, not generalize it.
>
> Currently, s390 doesn't use get_kaslr_offset() in its arch-specific
> code.
OK, I pushed a patch that generalizes it to my test repository.
Could you enable s390 to use it and test?
https://github.com/k-hagio/makedumpfile/tree/add-get_kaslr_offset_general
Thanks,
Kazu
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kazu
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mikhail
> >>
> >> On 09.12.2019 23:02, Kazuhito Hagio wrote:
> >>> Hi Mikhail,
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for late reply.
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> Since kernel v5.2 KASLR is supported on s390. In makedumpfile however no
> >>>> support has been added yet. This patch adds the arch specific function
> >>>> get_kaslr_offset() for s390x.
> >>>> Since the values in vmcoreinfo are already relocated, the patch is
> >>>> mainly relevant for vmlinux processing (-x option).
> >>>
> >>> In the current implementation of makedumpfile, the get_kaslr_offset(vaddr)
> >>> is supposed to return the KASLR offset only when the offset is needed to
> >>> add to the vaddr. So generally symbols from kernel (vmlinux) need it, but
> >>> symbols from modules are resolved dynamically and don't need the offset.
> >> \>
> >>> This patch always returns the offset if any, as a result, I guess this
> >>> patch
> >>> will not work as expected with module symbols in filter config file.
> >>>
> >>> So... How about making get_kaslr_offset_arm64() general for other archs
> >>> (get_kaslr_offset_general() or something), then using it also for s390?
> >>> If OK, I can do that generalization.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Kazu
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Philipp Rudo <[email protected]>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <[email protected]>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> arch/s390x.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> makedumpfile.h | 3 ++-
> >>>> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/s390x.c b/arch/s390x.c
> >>>> index bf9d58e..892df14 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/s390x.c
> >>>> +++ b/arch/s390x.c
> >>>> @@ -122,6 +122,38 @@ get_machdep_info_s390x(void)
> >>>> return TRUE;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> +unsigned long
> >>>> +get_kaslr_offset_s390x(unsigned long vaddr)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + unsigned int i;
> >>>> + char buf[BUFSIZE_FGETS], *endp;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if (!info->file_vmcoreinfo)
> >>>> + return FALSE;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if (fseek(info->file_vmcoreinfo, 0, SEEK_SET) < 0) {
> >>>> + ERRMSG("Can't seek the vmcoreinfo file(%s). %s\n",
> >>>> + info->name_vmcoreinfo, strerror(errno));
> >>>> + return FALSE;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>> + while (fgets(buf, BUFSIZE_FGETS, info->file_vmcoreinfo)) {
> >>>> + i = strlen(buf);
> >>>> + if (!i)
> >>>> + break;
> >>>> + if (buf[i - 1] == '\n')
> >>>> + buf[i - 1] = '\0';
> >>>> + if (strncmp(buf, STR_KERNELOFFSET,
> >>>> + strlen(STR_KERNELOFFSET)) == 0) {
> >>>> + info->kaslr_offset =
> >>>> + strtoul(buf + strlen(STR_KERNELOFFSET),
> >>>> &endp, 16);
> >>>> + DEBUG_MSG("info->kaslr_offset: %lx\n",
> >>>> info->kaslr_offset);
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return info->kaslr_offset;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> static int
> >>>> is_vmalloc_addr_s390x(unsigned long vaddr)
> >>>> {
> >>>> diff --git a/makedumpfile.h b/makedumpfile.h
> >>>> index ac11e90..26f6247 100644
> >>>> --- a/makedumpfile.h
> >>>> +++ b/makedumpfile.h
> >>>> @@ -1071,11 +1071,12 @@ unsigned long long vaddr_to_paddr_ppc(unsigned
> >>>> long vaddr);
> >>>> int get_machdep_info_s390x(void);
> >>>> unsigned long long vaddr_to_paddr_s390x(unsigned long vaddr);
> >>>> int is_iomem_phys_addr_s390x(unsigned long addr);
> >>>> +unsigned long get_kaslr_offset_s390x(unsigned long vaddr);
> >>>> #define find_vmemmap() stub_false()
> >>>> #define get_phys_base() stub_true()
> >>>> #define get_machdep_info() get_machdep_info_s390x()
> >>>> #define get_versiondep_info() stub_true()
> >>>> -#define get_kaslr_offset(X) stub_false()
> >>>> +#define get_kaslr_offset(X) get_kaslr_offset_s390x(X)
> >>>> #define vaddr_to_paddr(X) vaddr_to_paddr_s390x(X)
> >>>> #define paddr_to_vaddr(X) paddr_to_vaddr_general(X)
> >>>> #define is_phys_addr(X) is_iomem_phys_addr_s390x(X)
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.17.1
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
