On 2022-06-17 17:09:24 [+0100], Valentin Schneider wrote: > Those were pretty much my thoughts. I *think* panic() can be re-entrant on > the same CPU if the first entry was from NMI, but that still requires being > able to schedule a thread that panics which isn't a given after getting > that panic NMI. So for now actually doing the kexec in NMI (or IRQ) context > seems to be the less hazardous route.
most likely. Just get rid of the mutex and we should be good to go ;) Sebastian _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
