On 19/07/2022 19:04, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 7/19/2022 2:00 PM, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: >> On 19/07/2022 17:48, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >>> [...] >>> I would totally support an approach where instead of pr_info, there's a >>> tracepoint >>> for these events (and that shouldnt' need to be conditional on a config >>> option) >>> >>> that's not what the patch does though. >> >> This is a good idea Arjan! We could use trace events or pr_debug() - >> which one do you prefer? >> > > I'd go for a trace point to be honest >
ACK, I'll re-work it as a trace event then. Cheers, Guilherme _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
