On 8/12/22 19:34, Baoquan He wrote:
On 07/21/22 at 02:17pm, Eric DeVolder wrote:
...snip....
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index e58798f636d4..bb59596c8bea 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -2065,6 +2065,17 @@ config CRASH_DUMP
          (CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y).
          For more details see Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst
+config CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES
+       depends on CRASH_DUMP && KEXEC_FILE && (HOTPLUG_CPU || MEMORY_HOTPLUG)
+       int
+       default 32768

Do we need to enforce the value with page align and minimal size? I

Are you asking about the value CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES? This value represents
the maximum number of memory ranges, and there Elf64_Phdrs, that we need to
allow for elfcorehdr memory. So I'm not sure what the concern for alignment
is. I suppose we could also institute a minimum size for this value, say 1024.

checked crash_load_segments() in arch/x86/kernel/crash.c, it does the
page size aligning in kexec_add_buffer(). And in
load_crashdump_segments() of
kexec-tools/kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c, it creates elfcorehdr at
below code, the align is 1024, and in generic add_buffer()
implementation, it enforces the memsz page aligned, and changes the
passed align as page alignment.


        elfcorehdr = add_buffer(info, tmp, bufsz, memsz, align, min_base,
                                                         max_addr, -1);

Maybe we should at least mention this in the help text to notice people.

Unfortunately I do not yet understand the concern being raised.


+       help
+         For the kexec_file_load path, specify the maximum number of
+         memory regions, eg. as represented by the 'System RAM' entries
+         in /proc/iomem, that the elfcorehdr buffer/segment can accommodate.
+         This value is combined with NR_CPUS and multiplied by Elf64_Phdr
+         size to determine the final buffer size.
+
  config KEXEC_JUMP
        bool "kexec jump"
        depends on KEXEC && HIBERNATION
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/crash.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/crash.h
index 8b6bd63530dc..96051d8e4b45 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/crash.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/crash.h
@@ -9,4 +9,24 @@ int crash_setup_memmap_entries(struct kimage *image,
                struct boot_params *params);
  void crash_smp_send_stop(void);
+void *arch_map_crash_pages(unsigned long paddr, unsigned long size);
+#define arch_map_crash_pages arch_map_crash_pages
+
+void arch_unmap_crash_pages(void **ptr);
+#define arch_unmap_crash_pages arch_unmap_crash_pages
+
+void arch_crash_handle_hotplug_event(struct kimage *image,
+               unsigned int hp_action, unsigned int cpu);
+#define arch_crash_handle_hotplug_event arch_crash_handle_hotplug_event
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+static inline int crash_hotplug_cpu_support(void) { return 1; }
+#define crash_hotplug_cpu_support crash_hotplug_cpu_support
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
+static inline int crash_hotplug_memory_support(void) { return 1; }
+#define crash_hotplug_memory_support crash_hotplug_memory_support
+#endif
+
  #endif /* _ASM_X86_CRASH_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
index 9ceb93c176a6..55dda4fcde6e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
  #include <linux/slab.h>
  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
  #include <linux/memblock.h>
+#include <linux/highmem.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
  #include <asm/hardirq.h>
@@ -397,7 +398,17 @@ int crash_load_segments(struct kimage *image)
        image->elf_headers = kbuf.buffer;
        image->elf_headers_sz = kbuf.bufsz;
+#if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) || defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG)
+       /* Ensure elfcorehdr segment large enough for hotplug changes */
+       kbuf.memsz = (CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT + CONFIG_CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES) 
* sizeof(Elf64_Phdr);

Do we need to break the line to 80 chars?

Sure, I will do so.


+       /* For marking as usable to crash kernel */
+       image->elf_headers_sz = kbuf.memsz;

Do we need this code comment?

Well, it did take me a while to figure this particular item out in order for all
this code to work right (else the crash kernel would fail at boot time). So I
think it best to keep this comment.


+       /* Record the index of the elfcorehdr segment */
+       image->elfcorehdr_index = image->nr_segments;

And this place?

Not necessarily needed, but I've found it useful.


+       image->elfcorehdr_index_valid = true;
+#else
        kbuf.memsz = kbuf.bufsz;
+#endif
        kbuf.buf_align = ELF_CORE_HEADER_ALIGN;
        kbuf.mem = KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN;
        ret = kexec_add_buffer(&kbuf);
@@ -412,3 +423,107 @@ int crash_load_segments(struct kimage *image)
        return ret;
  }
  #endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE */
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) || defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG)
+void *arch_map_crash_pages(unsigned long paddr, unsigned long size)
+{
+       /*
+        * NOTE: The addresses and sizes passed to this routine have
+        * already been fully aligned on page boundaries. There is no
+        * need for massaging the address or size.
+        */

Can we move the code comment above function interface?

Yes


+       void *ptr = NULL;
+
+       /* NOTE: requires arch_kexec_[un]protect_crashkres() for write access */

Do we need this code comment? On ARCH where proctionion is made, we
surely need to the protect/unprotect.

I will remove this; I've mentioned this in handle_hotplug_event() where these
protect/unprotect functions are called.


+       if (size > 0) {
+               struct page *page = pfn_to_page(paddr >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+
+               ptr = kmap_local_page(page);
+       }
+
+       return ptr;
+}
+
+void arch_unmap_crash_pages(void **ptr)
+{
+       if (ptr) {
+               if (*ptr)
+                       kunmap_local(*ptr);
+               *ptr = NULL;
+       }
+}
+
+/**
+ * arch_crash_handle_hotplug_event() - Handle hotplug elfcorehdr changes
+ * @image: the active struct kimage
+ * @hp_action: the hot un/plug action being handled
+ * @cpu: when KEXEC_CRASH_HP_ADD/REMOVE_CPU, the cpu affected
+ *
+ * To accurately reflect hot un/plug changes, the elfcorehdr (which
+ * is passed to the crash kernel via the elfcorehdr= parameter)
+ * must be updated with the new list of CPUs and memories. The new
+ * elfcorehdr is prepared in a kernel buffer, and then it is
+ * written on top of the existing/old elfcorehdr.
+ *
+ * For hotplug changes to elfcorehdr to work, two conditions are
+ * needed:
+ * First, the segment containing the elfcorehdr must be large enough
+ * to permit a growing number of resources. See the
+ * CONFIG_CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES description.
+ * Second, purgatory must explicitly exclude the elfcorehdr from the
+ * list of segments it checks (since the elfcorehdr changes and thus
+ * would require an update to purgatory itself to update the digest).

Isn't this generic concept to crash hotplug? Should we move it out to
some generic place?

Yes, so I will relocate this.


+ *
+ */
+void arch_crash_handle_hotplug_event(struct kimage *image,
+       unsigned int hp_action, unsigned int cpu)

The passed in 'cpu' is not used at all, what is it added for? I didn't
see explanation about it.

Well its not used for x86, but as I recall, Sourabh Jain needed it for the 
PowerPC handler.


+{
+       struct kexec_segment *ksegment;
+       unsigned char *ptr = NULL;
+       unsigned long elfsz = 0;
+       void *elfbuf = NULL;
+       unsigned long mem, memsz;
+
+       /*
+        * Elfcorehdr_index_valid checked in crash_core:handle_hotplug_event()
+        */
+       ksegment = &image->segment[image->elfcorehdr_index];
+       mem = ksegment->mem;
+       memsz = ksegment->memsz;
+
+       /*
+        * Create the new elfcorehdr reflecting the changes to CPU and/or
+        * memory resources.
+        */
+       if (prepare_elf_headers(image, &elfbuf, &elfsz)) {
+               pr_err("crash hp: unable to prepare elfcore headers");
+               goto out;
+       }
+       if (elfsz > memsz) {
+               pr_err("crash hp: update elfcorehdr elfsz %lu > memsz %lu",
+                       elfsz, memsz);
+               goto out;
+       }
+
+       /*
+        * At this point, we are all but assured of success.
+        * Copy new elfcorehdr into destination.
+        */
+       ptr = arch_map_crash_pages(mem, memsz);
+       if (ptr) {
+               /*
+                * Temporarily invalidate the crash image while the
+                * elfcorehdr is updated.
+                */
+               xchg(&kexec_crash_image, NULL);
+               memcpy_flushcache((void *)ptr, elfbuf, elfsz);
+               xchg(&kexec_crash_image, image);
+       }
+       arch_unmap_crash_pages((void **)&ptr);
+       pr_debug("crash hp: re-loaded elfcorehdr at 0x%lx\n", mem);
+
+out:
+       if (elfbuf)
+               vfree(elfbuf);
+}
+#endif
--
2.31.1



_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Reply via email to