> These are sort of "tautological" arguments. There must be some > objective reasons why this architecture was chosen instead of > other (i.e. using what already pre-exists).
I think I misunderstood you in my earlier reply. I do not understand in what way you think my arguments are tautological. Can you elaborate? _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
