On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 16:41:17 +0800, Baoquan He <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Yuntao, > > On 12/30/23 at 06:16pm, Baoquan He wrote: > > On 12/29/23 at 12:10pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 11:31:04 +0800 Baoquan He <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Imagine we have a crashkernel region 256M reserved under 4G, say > > > > > > [2G, 2G+256M]. > > > > > > Then after excluding the 256M from a region, it should stop. But > > > > > > now, this patch > > > > > > will make it continue scanning. Not sure if it's all in my mind. > > > > > > > > > > Hi Baoquan, > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for such a detailed reply. Now I finally understand why the > > > > > code is > > > > > written this way. > > > > > > > > > > However, if we can guarantee its correctness, wouldn't it be better > > > > > to use the > > > > > generic region removing logic? At least it is more concise and clear, > > > > > and other > > > > > people reading this code for the first time wouldn't get confused > > > > > like me. > > > > > > > > > > As for your concern about the while loop, I think it wouldn't affect > > > > > performance > > > > > much because the total number of loops is small. > > > > > > > > Well, see below kexec-tools commit, you wouldn't say that. And when you > > > > understand the code, you will feel a little uncomfortable about the > > > > sustaining useless scanning. At least, we should stop scanning after > > > > needed exluding is done. > > > > > > > > Or, we may need add a generic region removing function so that it > > > > can be shared, e.g e820 memory region removing, memblock region > > > > removing. > > > > Otherwise, I can't see why a specific region excluding need a generic > > > > region removing function. > > > > > > So where do we now stand on this patchset? > > > > The patch 1 and 2 are good clean up. The patch 3 plus below one, the > > entire is a good code improvement patch. > > > > [PATCH] crash_core: optimize crash_exclude_mem_range() > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/T/#u > > Can you repost this patchset with some updating, e.g adding ack in patch > 1 and 2, and squash below patch into patch 3? This will be easier for > patch merging. > > [PATCH] crash_core: optimize crash_exclude_mem_range() > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/T/#u > > And, you may need to drop below patchset since patch 2 conflicts with > this patchset, and patch 1 is conflicting with fuqiang's patch. > > [PATCH 0/2] crash: fix potential cmem->ranges array overflow > > Thanks > Baoquan Hi Baoquan, I've reposted this patchset, the link to the v2 version of this patchset is: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/t/#u _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
