On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 04:46:39PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 09:01:49AM -0500, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
> > If we skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() (which should probably be anyway skipped
> > for kexec case), then for kexec boot, EFI memmap is memremapped in the same
> > virtual address as the first kernel and not the allocated memblock address.
>
> Are you saying that we should simply do
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> index fdf07dd6f459..410cb0743289 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> @@ -577,6 +577,9 @@ void __init efi_mem_reserve(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size)
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT)))
> return;
>
> + if (kexec_in_progress)
> + return;
> +
> if (!memblock_is_region_reserved(addr, size))
> memblock_reserve(addr, size);
>
> and skip that whole call?
I think Ashish suggested rather
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
index fdf07dd6f459..eccc10ab15a4 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
@@ -580,6 +580,9 @@ void __init efi_mem_reserve(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size)
if (!memblock_is_region_reserved(addr, size))
memblock_reserve(addr, size);
+ if (kexec_in_progress)
+ return;
+
/*
* Some architectures (x86) reserve all boot services ranges
* until efi_free_boot_services() because of buggy firmware
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
