On 04/15/25 at 07:10pm, steven chen wrote:
> From: Steven Chen <chen...@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> The extra memory allocated for carrying the IMA measurement list across
> kexec is hard-coded as half a PAGE.  Make it configurable.
> 
> Define a Kconfig option, IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_MEMORY_KB, to configure the
> extra memory (in kb) to be allocated for IMA measurements added during
> kexec soft reboot.  Ensure the default value of the option is set such
> that extra half a page of memory for additional measurements is allocated
> for the additional measurements.
> 
> Update ima_add_kexec_buffer() function to allocate memory based on the
> Kconfig option value, rather than the currently hard-coded one.
> 
> Suggested-by: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusha...@linux.microsoft.com>
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Signed-off-by: Steven Chen <chen...@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
>  security/integrity/ima/Kconfig     | 11 +++++++++++
>  security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

The contributor's tag need be updated too, otherwise,

Acked-by: Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com>

> 
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
> index 475c32615006..976e75f9b9ba 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
> @@ -321,4 +321,15 @@ config IMA_DISABLE_HTABLE
>       help
>          This option disables htable to allow measurement of duplicate 
> records.
>  
> +config IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_MEMORY_KB
> +     int "Extra memory for IMA measurements added during kexec soft reboot"
> +     range 0 40
> +     depends on IMA_KEXEC
> +     default 0
> +     help
> +       IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_MEMORY_KB determines the extra memory to be
> +       allocated (in kb) for IMA measurements added during kexec soft reboot.
> +       If set to the default value of 0, an extra half page of memory for 
> those
> +       additional measurements will be allocated.
> +
>  endif
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c 
> b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> index ed867734ee70..d1c9d369ba08 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image)
>                                 .buf_min = 0, .buf_max = ULONG_MAX,
>                                 .top_down = true };
>       unsigned long binary_runtime_size;
> +     unsigned long extra_memory;
>  
>       /* use more understandable variable names than defined in kbuf */
>       size_t kexec_buffer_size = 0;
> @@ -125,15 +126,20 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image)
>       int ret;
>  
>       /*
> -      * Reserve an extra half page of memory for additional measurements
> -      * added during the kexec load.
> +      * Reserve extra memory for measurements added during kexec.
>        */
> -     binary_runtime_size = ima_get_binary_runtime_size();
> +     if (CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_MEMORY_KB <= 0)
> +             extra_memory = PAGE_SIZE / 2;
> +     else
> +             extra_memory = CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC_EXTRA_MEMORY_KB * 1024;
> +
> +     binary_runtime_size = ima_get_binary_runtime_size() + extra_memory;
> +
>       if (binary_runtime_size >= ULONG_MAX - PAGE_SIZE)
>               kexec_segment_size = ULONG_MAX;
>       else
> -             kexec_segment_size = ALIGN(ima_get_binary_runtime_size() +
> -                                        PAGE_SIZE / 2, PAGE_SIZE);
> +             kexec_segment_size = ALIGN(binary_runtime_size, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
>       if ((kexec_segment_size == ULONG_MAX) ||
>           ((kexec_segment_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) > totalram_pages() / 2)) {
>               pr_err("Binary measurement list too large.\n");
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 


Reply via email to