On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 01:56:57PM +0800, Youling Tang wrote:
> From: Youling Tang <tangyoul...@kylinos.cn>
> 
> This patch adds support for kexec_file on LoongArch.
> 
> The efi_kexec_load() as two parts:
> - the first part loads the kernel image (vmlinuz.efi or vmlinux.efi)
> - the second part loads other segments (eg: initrd, cmdline)
> 
> This initrd will be passed to the second kernel via the command line
> 'initrd=start,size'.
> 
> Currently, pez(vmlinuz.efi) and pei(vmlinux.efi) format images are supported,
> but ELF format is not supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyoul...@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  arch/loongarch/Kconfig                     |   9 ++
>  arch/loongarch/include/asm/image.h         |  17 +++
>  arch/loongarch/include/asm/kexec.h         |  12 +++
>  arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile             |   1 +
>  arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c          | 111 +++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec.c      |  33 ++++--
>  arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 289 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c
>  create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c

...

> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/image.h 
> b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/image.h
> index 1f090736e71d..655d5836c4e8 100644
> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/image.h
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/image.h
> @@ -36,5 +36,22 @@ struct loongarch_image_header {
>       uint32_t pe_header;
>  };
>  
> +static const uint8_t loongarch_image_pe_sig[2] = {'M', 'Z'};
> +
> +/**
> + * loongarch_header_check_pe_sig - Helper to check the loongarch image 
> header.
> + *
> + * Returns non-zero if 'MZ' signature is found.
> + */
> +
> +static inline int loongarch_header_check_pe_sig(const struct 
> loongarch_image_header *h)
> +{
> +     if (!h)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     return (h->pe_sig[0] == loongarch_image_pe_sig[0]
> +             && h->pe_sig[1] == loongarch_image_pe_sig[1]);
> +}

This check is still too weak and doesn't improve comparing to v1.

> This could be simplified with a memcmp(). Also, this check isn't
> strict enough: PE files for any architectures, and even legacy MS-DOS
> COM executables all start with "MZ".

I've pointed this out in my previous reply[1].

>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>  #endif /* __ASM_IMAGE_H */

...

> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c 
> b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7741f1139a12
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c

...

> +static void *efi_kexec_load(struct kimage *image,
> +                             char *kernel, unsigned long kernel_len,
> +                             char *initrd, unsigned long initrd_len,
> +                             char *cmdline, unsigned long cmdline_len)
> +{
> +     struct loongarch_image_header *h;
> +     struct kexec_buf kbuf;
> +     unsigned long text_offset, kernel_segment_number;
> +     struct kexec_segment *kernel_segment;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     h = (struct loongarch_image_header *)kernel;
> +     if (!h->image_size)
> +             return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> +     /* Load the kernel */
> +     kbuf.image = image;
> +     kbuf.buf_max = ULONG_MAX;
> +     kbuf.top_down = false;
> +
> +     kbuf.buffer = kernel;
> +     kbuf.bufsz = kernel_len;
> +     kbuf.mem = KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN;
> +     kbuf.memsz = le64_to_cpu(h->image_size);
> +     text_offset = le64_to_cpu(h->text_offset);
> +     kbuf.buf_min = text_offset;
> +     kbuf.buf_align = SZ_2M;
> +
> +     kernel_segment_number = image->nr_segments;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * The location of the kernel segment may make it impossible to satisfy
> +      * the other segment requirements, so we try repeatedly to find a
> +      * location that will work.
> +      */
> +     while ((ret = kexec_add_buffer(&kbuf)) == 0) {
> +             /* Try to load additional data */
> +             kernel_segment = &image->segment[kernel_segment_number];
> +             ret = load_other_segments(image, kernel_segment->mem,
> +                                       kernel_segment->memsz, initrd,
> +                                       initrd_len, cmdline, cmdline_len);
> +             if (!ret)
> +                     break;
> +
> +             /*
> +              * We couldn't find space for the other segments; erase the
> +              * kernel segment and try the next available hole.
> +              */
> +             image->nr_segments -= 1;
> +             kbuf.buf_min = kernel_segment->mem + kernel_segment->memsz;
> +             kbuf.mem = KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (ret) {
> +             pr_err("Could not find any suitable kernel location!");
> +             return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +     }
> +
> +     kernel_segment = &image->segment[kernel_segment_number];
> +
> +     /* Make sure the second kernel jumps to the correct "kernel_entry". */
> +     image->start = kernel_segment->mem + h->kernel_entry - text_offset;

And this still assumes the loaded, secondary kernel is relocatable,
with neither extra check nor comment explaining its limitation.

Please see my previous reply[2] that explains why loading a
non-relocatble kernel with kexec_file API is reasonable.

> +     kexec_dprintk("Loaded kernel at 0x%lx bufsz=0x%lx memsz=0x%lx\n",
> +                   kernel_segment->mem, kbuf.bufsz,
> +                   kernel_segment->memsz);
> +
> +     return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +const struct kexec_file_ops kexec_efi_ops = {
> +     .probe = efi_kexec_probe,
> +     .load = efi_kexec_load,
> +};

Thanks,
Yao Zi

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aJojDiHWi8cgvA2W@pie/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aJwFa8x5BQMouB1y@pie/

Reply via email to