On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 07:10:45PM +0100, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> Currently the KHO test only prints a message on success, and remains
> silent on failure. This makes it difficult to notice a failing test. A
> failing test is usually more interesting than a successful one.
> 
> Always print the test status after attempting restore.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <[email protected]>

> ---
>  lib/test_kho.c | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/test_kho.c b/lib/test_kho.c
> index 85b60d87a50ad..47de562807955 100644
> --- a/lib/test_kho.c
> +++ b/lib/test_kho.c
> @@ -306,7 +306,6 @@ static int kho_test_restore(phys_addr_t fdt_phys)
>       if (err)
>               return err;
>  
> -     pr_info("KHO restore succeeded\n");
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -319,8 +318,15 @@ static int __init kho_test_init(void)
>               return 0;
>  
>       err = kho_retrieve_subtree(KHO_TEST_FDT, &fdt_phys);
> -     if (!err)
> -             return kho_test_restore(fdt_phys);
> +     if (!err) {
> +             err = kho_test_restore(fdt_phys);
> +             if (err)
> +                     pr_err("KHO restore failed\n");
> +             else
> +                     pr_info("KHO restore succeeded\n");
> +
> +             return err;
> +     }
>  
>       if (err != -ENOENT) {
>               pr_warn("failed to retrieve %s FDT: %d\n", KHO_TEST_FDT, err);
> 
> base-commit: f0bfdc2b69f5c600b88ee484c01b213712c63d94
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

Reply via email to