On Mon, Dec 01 2025, Mike Rapoport wrote: > Hi Pratyush, > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 02:45:59PM +0100, Pratyush Yadav wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 25 2025, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > ... > >> > @@ -243,11 +243,16 @@ static struct page *kho_restore_page(phys_addr_t >> > phys) >> > /* Head page gets refcount of 1. */ >> > set_page_count(page, 1); >> > >> > - /* For higher order folios, tail pages get a page count of zero. */ >> > + /* >> > + * For higher order folios, tail pages get a page count of zero. >> > + * For physically contiguous order-0 pages every pages gets a page >> > + * count of 1 >> > + */ >> > + ref_cnt = is_folio ? 0 : 1; >> > for (unsigned int i = 1; i < nr_pages; i++) >> > - set_page_count(page + i, 0); >> > + set_page_count(page + i, ref_cnt); >> > >> > - if (info.order > 0) >> > + if (is_folio && info.order) >> >> This is getting a bit difficult to parse. Let's separate out folio and >> page initialization to separate helpers: > > Sorry, I've missed this earlier and now the patches are in akpm's -stable > branch. > Let's postpone these changes for the next cycle, maybe along with support > for deferred initialization of struct page.
Sure, no problem. [...] -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav
