On Mon, Jun 01 2026, Pratyush Yadav wrote: > On Mon, Jun 01 2026, kernel test robot wrote: > >> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/liveupdate/linux.git >> next >> head: f4b4f5fe58a55a4212a263d9d44416778ca6e7a7 >> commit: 74cab0be9a5d9d91471c4dee7311dcdfc1c0a6f4 [11/21] liveupdate: >> validate session type before performing operation >> config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-003-20260601 >> (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260601/[email protected]/config) >> compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project >> 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) >> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): >> (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260601/[email protected]/reproduce) >> >> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version >> of >> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags >> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> >> | Closes: >> https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/ >> >> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> >>>> kernel/liveupdate/luo_session.c:344:48: error: too few arguments provided >>>> to function-like macro invocation >> 344 | struct liveupdate_session_retrieve_fd, token), >> | ^ >> kernel/liveupdate/luo_session.c:327:9: note: macro 'IOCTL_OP' defined here >> 327 | #define IOCTL_OP(_ioctl, _fn, _struct, _last, _type) >> \ >> | ^ >>>> kernel/liveupdate/luo_session.c:343:2: error: use of undeclared identifier >>>> 'IOCTL_OP' >> 343 | IOCTL_OP(LIVEUPDATE_SESSION_RETRIEVE_FD, >> luo_session_retrieve_fd, >> | ^ >>>> kernel/liveupdate/luo_session.c:378:6: error: invalid application of >>>> 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'const struct luo_ioctl_op[]' >> 378 | ARRAY_SIZE(luo_session_ioctl_ops)) { >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/array_size.h:11:32: note: expanded from macro 'ARRAY_SIZE' >> 11 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) + >> __must_be_array(arr)) >> | ^~~~~ >> 3 errors generated. > > This happens because the patch got moved from the fixes branch to next, > and next has a new ioctl. Will send a fixup soon.
Nevermind. Seems like this is already fixed (thanks to Mike I think?). -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav
