On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 09:52:31AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 10:42:00AM -0400, Gregory Price wrote: > > > > Is there a non-verbiage reason to justify these changes? Living with > > "scratch" seems better than potentially breaking folks. > > I don't think these are the first breaking changes. And if the changes > are fine, then that means more breaking changes are fine, too. So why is > this upstream at all until the design is settled? >
Surely we should not break deployments for the sake of renaming something that is very arguably already aptly named? ~Gregory
