On Wed 2022-11-09 10:33:55, John Ogness wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On 2022-11-09, Daniel Thompson <daniel.thomp...@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> +  /*
> >> +   * The console_srcu_read_lock() only provides safe console list
> >> +   * traversal. The use of the ->write() callback relies on all other
> >> +   * CPUs being stopped at the moment and console drivers being able to
> >> +   * handle reentrance when @oops_in_progress is set. (Note that there
> >> +   * is no guarantee for either criteria.)
> >> +   */
> >
> > The debugger entry protocol does ensure that other CPUs are either
> > stopped or unresponsive. In the case where the other CPU is unresponsive
> > (e.g. timed out after being asked to stop) then there is a "real" printk()
> > issued prior to any of the above interference with the console system to
> > the developer driving the debugger gets as much clue as we can offer them
> > about what is going on (typically this is emitted from regular interrupt
> > context).
> >
> > Given this comment is part of the debugger code then for the
> > oops_in_progress hack it might be more helpful to describe what
> > the developer in front the debugger needs to do to have the most
> > reliable debug session possible.
> >
> >   There is no guarantee that every console drivers can handle reentrance
> >   in this way; the developer deploying the debugger is responsible for
> >   ensuring that the console drivers they have selected handle reentrance
> >   appropriately.
> 
> Thanks for the explanation. I will change the comment to:
> 
>       /*
>        * The console_srcu_read_lock() only provides safe console list
>        * traversal. The use of the ->write() callback relies on all other
>        * CPUs being stopped at the moment and console drivers being able to
>        * handle reentrance when @oops_in_progress is set.
>        *
>        * There is no guarantee that every console driver can handle
>        * reentrance in this way; the developer deploying the debugger
>        * is responsible for ensuring that the console drivers they
>        * have selected handle reentrance appropriately.
>        */

Looks good to me.

After merging this with the 10th patch that adds the data_race() annotated
check of CON_ENABLED flag:

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.com>

Best Regards,
Petr


_______________________________________________
Kgdb-bugreport mailing list
Kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport

Reply via email to