On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Dick Hollenbeck <[email protected]> wrote: > > The gEDA project will not take this lying down. I suggest we give serious > attention soon > to writing conversion programs from all of their formats. It's weird having > to think > about competing here. But I have been playing this game in the software > private sector > for 30 years, and know that being able to provide a conversion path for > datafiles from the > competing tool into yours is critical to gaining market share.
I don't like to think of this as competition. We just need a tool (at least one) that will be on par with non-open tools in terms of features and quality. Hopefully many of the things we develop can be used by gEDA and viceversa. The concept of competition applies well to situations where you're figting for a scarce resource, much less so here, I think. The foss-pcb mailing list embodies this quite well. You have people from Kicad, gEDA and others discussing what's good for a FOSS PCB design tool. My guess is that both Kicad and gEDA have/will soon have so many contributors that the limiting factor will be how to coordinate things. So they will not be competing for developers. What else could they be competing for? > These conversion tools could be external, and written in a language of your > choice. This is a perfect example of things that should be done in collaboration with the gEDA people. Now, I would like to give some context: - We are not "CERN" but a part of it (the ones pushing for Open Source Hardware). CERN is very big. There will be people who stay with non-open tools. Hopefully with time their case will become less compelling. - I would really like the foss-pcb list to remain this neutral meeting place for all sorts of FOSS PCB tool developers. Whoever is interested in this broader context can find more information here: http://www.ohwr.org/projects/ohr-meta/wiki/Foss-pcb - We are very willing to play first domino and this is in fact already happening. People from the Facebook Open Compute project and others are in contact with us to collaborate on this. I hope the Open Hardware workshop next week can be used to discuss with some key actors and come up with a good plan. BTW, if someone wants to attend, registration closes today! See http://www.ohwr.org/projects/ohr-meta/wiki/OHWorkshop - For the time being, I have asked a company (http://www.signalsoftware.es/) to turn the feature wish list in the foss-pcb pages into a work package list for Kicad, so that people who want to lend a hand and don't know where have a list of work packages to choose from. I will of course make sure whatever is done by us or our collaborators is contributed in the standard way, respecting all the non-written rules of FOSS. I look forward to collaborating with everyone in this list. Cheers! Javier _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
