On 11/22/2011 09:39 AM, [email protected] wrote: > To all, > > PLEASE, do not act in the heat of moment. You all speak right and importrant > things, but we all could clear our disagreements (as stated in title), and > found a consensus, or see that our disagreements are essential, critical and > irremovable. And only after that we could made a resolution. Every rift is a > big drawback, so we should analyse all varians and carefully weight all > drawbacks and benefits of our actions. Analyse and weight before it done. > Masters have their own reasons to do things in their way, so we could > understand them too. > > Thank to masters, Kicad is in 'stand still' but is stable and good debugged, > so their scepticism about changes is reasonable. For the code to be > redesigned and lots of features to be added we should go back to highly > experimental state. There should be enough 'coding force' and management > resources to keep TWO projects (legacy KiCad and new KiCad) in living state. > I hope we still be together despite of all conflicts. > > P. s. I may be unavailable for a day or two to Kicad, excuses in advance.
Thank you for your concern for OUR project. Have a nice couple of days. I believe we can work this out and remain respectful of each other. That is one of the things that sets this project apart I think. Dick _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
