Why not a context free grammar definition. It seems to me that the so-called parser is actually nothing but a character stream scanner. A formal definition would help in many ways.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lorenzo Marcantonio Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 6:04 AM To: Kicad Developers Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] possible typo or not? $EndSCHEMATC On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 04:22:33PM +0200, Edwin van den Oetelaar wrote: > Should this not read "$EndSchematic\n" > to be consistent? Uhmm.. *maybe* > It appears that during reading of the file just "$End" is matched. Exactly, so in practice it doesn't matter XD eeschema parser is easy to please as you can see > Is there a definition somewhere? File format in kicad-doc, not fully updated but that's ancient stuff anyway (IIRC it always was written this way) -- Lorenzo Marcantonio Logos Srl _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
