bzr branch lp:~simon-huwyler/kicad/layerConstraints From: Simon Huwyler Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 11:48 AM To: Dick Hollenbeck Cc: KiCad Developers Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] layer based constraints
I have uploaded a branch. It’s still the version with simple constraints for layers which won’t probably be what we want. But if you feel like getting a hands-on-experience of how the however-layer-dependent constraints could “look and feel” like, feel free to try it out. Select the option to show clearances for all tracks. I really like it this way. Unfortunately I haven’t had much time to do more investigations of how the constraints should and could look like (5 months old twins, Mummy is out of house, Daddy has to look after...) But I will have a look at it asap! Best regards Simon From: Dick Hollenbeck Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 2:42 PM To: Simon Huwyler Cc: KiCad Developers ; Lorenzo Marcantonio Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] layer based constraints On May 8, 2013 7:31 AM, "Dick Hollenbeck" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On May 8, 2013 7:24 AM, "Simon Huwyler" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Kicad evolves based on individual need. Try and stay close to your > >> individual use cases, else you may end up creating something few will use. > >> Einstein: as simple as possible, but not simpler. > > > > > > So, if I get you right, the whole KiCad repository is merely a huge > > collection of branches each one created for personal needs (as in my case > > the very special need to deal with _fabrication_ layer constraints), and > > only time will show what turns out to be a feature that should be taken > > into the main branch? > > > > So, my approch was not that bad, indeed! :-) Therefore, I should upload > > this branch, even knowing that it is useful for _me_ and probably no one > > else? > > Sorry for these newbie-ish questions. But this is really a whole new world > > for me. :-) I was quite reluctant doing so, because I thought I should only > > "contribute" things that are really useful to others and have a chance to > > eventually make it to the main branch. > > This approach is now common in launchpad hosted projects and at github. > > Your blueprint idea is worth a try. I don't know how good its UI is. A forum with topic specific threads might be more useful. Rate of improvement in launchpad is slow at this point. Shuttleworth is chasing bigger fish. No sign of the $100, 000, 000 investment at github either. They still cannot even display source lines wider than about 80 characters. But free only buys you so much. But often great ideas are lost in the stream of the mailing list. > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Lorenzo Marcantonio > > Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 2:12 PM > > > > To: Kicad Developers > > Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] layer based constraints > > > > On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 07:03:48AM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > >> > >> Alfons, in munich, worked for zucken (spelling), an eda company, for 15 > >> years, well bfore writing freerouter. His UI includes netclass features. > >> It is not obvious that they merely mimic the specctra spec. If not, is > >> this his experience being injected to trump something he thought was > >> imperfect? > > > > > > I can't say... SPECCTRA was a pre-existing product, and simply became the > > defacto interface. Maybe it's simply well engineered for the things it > > needs to do, but then every company will 'personalize' it depending on > > the requirements (so they can say "our specctra is better than yours!"). > > The same freerouter AFAIK don't implement it in full (no arcs, for > > example, seeing the kicad code). > > > > Or maybe the author of freerouter simply added the extra features > > because they were convenient (and to hell with the specctra standard). > > > >> Kicad evolves based on individual need. Try and stay close to your > >> individual use cases, else you may end up creating something few will use. > >> Einstein: as simple as possible, but not simpler. > > > > > > That's why we are discussing if/how enhanced rules can be applied. > > > > -- > > Lorenzo Marcantonio > > Logos Srl > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > Post to : [email protected] > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > Post to : [email protected] > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
<<wlEmoticon-smile[1].png>>
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
