On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:28:32PM -0700, Cirilo Bernardo wrote: > Oh yes, the OMAP ones can be worse. A huge section of the chip errata have to > do with USB issues, and I'm not happy with the length of TI's chip errata > either. Some faults have persisted across 2 chip revisions. Sometimes I get > the impression that TI has no interest in creating a working processor.
OMAP == consumer, don't be so surprised... another TI errata which is absurdly fun is for an NFC controller/transceiver (don't remember the part number). It can be used with parallel, 3-wire SPI or 4-wire SPI. Errata #1: 3-wire SPI doesn't work. Workaround: Use 4-wire SPI :D:D Not that other manufacturers are better; a dsPIC33 errata substantially says: don't ever *hope* to get the part programmed over JTAG, we left that part out (were they out of silicon area?!). And don't care to trap DMA conflicts either since they trigger whenever they want (if they trigger at all). Seems that the whole industry is plagued by too short development cycles... -- Lorenzo Marcantonio Logos Srl _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
