Hi Folks, Any thoughts on merging the 3d_initial_merge branch? Between mainly Mario and myself and a few reports by others (nickoe, reportingsjr) we have sorted out quite a few bugs and other deficiencies but I think the only way to get more testing from users is to merge the code. I believe that the new parsers all offer much better specifications compliance compared to the old parsers and the code is more robust. As an example, there is this post by a user:
https://forum.kicad.info/t/trouble-with-3d-models-vrml/2320/7 The user's models, D_Pak.wrl (VRML1) and D_Pakx.wrl (VRML2) load and display correctly in the file preview which uses the new parsers. In the legacy parsers, D_Pak.wrl causes a segfault and D_Pakx.wrl does not display correctly. Note: the 3d_initial_merge branch still uses the legacy 3DViewer so the 3DViewer will segfault on the D_Pak.wrl model, but for me this only serves as a reminder of some of the improvements gained with the new 3D plugin system. - Cirilo
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
