I wasnt saying its a good idea, but having invisible pins indicates that
you want to connect to something that is not visible, its literaly there
in the name. An invisible pin.
I mean, otherwise there could be a stacked pin instead. Im not saying
that invisible pins are good practise, but thats not really for me to say.
What is silly is having invisible pins working as no-pins except if they
are a stacked pin, well that doesnt sound clear to me.
-Kristoffer
On 2017-02-07 12:33, Chris Pavlina wrote:
Honestly I think that's one of the silliest things I've ever heard. Pins
that you can't see should make connections that you can't see to wires
that you can? The ONLY imaginable use case for this is stacks of pins.
Every other possible case is a mistake.
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 11:09:44AM +0100, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
Honestly I think the invisible pins are supposed to work exactly as they
are, that they should be able to connect, otherwise there are the "no
connect" - pin type or the option of just removing the pin from the symbol
altogether.
- Kristoffer
On 02/07/2017 10:02 AM, Oliver Walters wrote:
Kristoffer this is good feedback. I did not expect this to get pushed
straight away, and perhaps there is a way forward that won't break
schematics.
Relying on implicit connected that is *not* displayed on the schematic
seems like a very bad idea to me.
I appreciate your use case (I currently have a few symbols that do that
too).
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Kristoffer Ödmark
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
This seems dangerous, I have seen a few design where there are 5-10
pins hidden under the same pin, excpecting them to be connected.
I would rather this hidden connections were indicated in some way,
this change disconnects lines and might break some users
footprints-symbols connection.
- Kristoffer
On 02/07/2017 09:47 AM, Oliver Walters wrote:
Hi all,
The attached patch prevents invisible pins from being connected
using
the wire tool in eeschema.
a) If you connect a wire endpoint to the same position as a pin
endpoint, they are NOT connected visually
b) Wires and insivible pins are also ignored during netlist creation
c) This does not affect the ability of invisible power-pins to
automatically connect to global power labels
Is the current behavior of connecting invisible pins to wire
endpoints
desired? Or is it just an aberration?
If there is a very good reason that pins not visible in the
schematic
are able to be connected silently?
before: http://i.imgur.com/3gModvW.png
after: http://i.imgur.com/r8O7c3Y.png
(Note the 'dangling' wire-end indication)
Cheers,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
<https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
Post to : [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
<https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
<https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
--
-Kristoffer
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
<https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
Post to : [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
<https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
<https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
--
-Kristoffer
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
