For OS X packages, it would change a script, but shouldn't be a problem. Adam Wolf
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Oliver Walters <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Recently I raised this issue: > > https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg27922.html > > There were some good responses, thanks for the input. > > First task is going to be moving the 3D models, as this will be > significantly easier. > > e.g. something like GitHub.com/KiCad/packages3D > > To this end, I'd like some further information from those in the know: > > A) is there any impediment to having the KISYS3DMOD envvar point to > somewhere different? e.g. ./KiCad/share/packages3D/ > B) To the package managers, how much effort to package 3D models from a > separate repo? > C) to the docs maintainers, would there be much to change if we redirected > the 3D repo? > D) Generally, what other considerations would be required? > > Essentially, if I made this change right now without telling anyone, what > would I break? > > As a side note there have been some great recent contributions to the 3D > data, with a fair bit of momentum over at the forums. > > Regards, > Oliver > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
