Hi, On 08.06.2017 23:56, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote:
> I attached a patch where i removed all of them just to show how many of > them there are, also suggest that we remove that from the coding policy > ( patch 2 ). Would it make sense to use "noexcept" still? > Are there any considerations regarding becoming c++11 compatible? We already use C++11, e.g. for range-based for and std::shared_ptr. Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
