On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 02:03:29AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > On 08.06.2017 23:56, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote: > > > I attached a patch where i removed all of them just to show how many of > > them there are, also suggest that we remove that from the coding policy > > ( patch 2 ). > > Would it make sense to use "noexcept" still?
"noexcept" was *added* in C++11 so it's obviously allowed in C++11. Decent explanation about this here: http://blog.quasardb.net/when-noexcept-2/ > > > Are there any considerations regarding becoming c++11 compatible? > > We already use C++11, e.g. for range-based for and std::shared_ptr. > > Simon > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
