Am Di., 31. Juli 2018 um 07:31 Uhr schrieb Wayne Stambaugh < stambau...@gmail.com>:
> On 7/31/2018 8:33 AM, Carsten Schoenert wrote: > > Am 31.07.18 um 17:50 schrieb Andrew Lutsenko: > > ... > >> Can swig on the qa machine be updated? Or better yet can you upgrade to > >> debian 9? Debian 9 has swig 3.0.10 and compiles this just fine. > >> Aside from this debian 8 is very old and should be done away with anyway > >> because of security, old compilers, etc. > > > > Argumentation by missing security isn't a valid choice, even now the > > ELTS team is taking care of security updates, old versions can be solved > > by using backports, even swig has 3.0.10 in jessie-backports. I agree > > that GCC wont become any version updates for Jessie. > > > > But there are still users out there which use Jessie based desktops. > > > > I'm siding with Carsten on this. There are people who prefer stable > computing platforms and I want to avoid making kicad only build on the > latest distros. I prefer that we keep as large of a target audience as > possible. How difficult would it be to change the SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN > object (actually its the VECTOR2 object that causes the swig issue) so > that older versions of swig don't choke on it? I would be open to that > solution. > > Cheers, > > Wayne > > I'm not sure I follow the discussion. I thought Carsten was saying that jessie-backports does have SWIG 3.0.10 and so we can upgrade swig on the kicad-qa without changing to a newer debian. @Andrew - can you compile your changes on debian 8 using the swig from backports as Carsten described? If not, then this is moot and we'd need to look at a SWIG-specific VECTOR2, an outcome that might be long-term problematic. -S
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp